Calculus I › Exponential & log laws › full formula sheet

(ex)y = exy

Say it: “e to the x, all raised to the y, equals e to the x times y”

Power of a power

Raising a power to a power: multiply the exponents — and how to stop mixing it up with the product-of-powers law.

Notation on this page: e ≈ 2.718 is Euler's number; x and y are real numbers. Compare with the previous law: ex·ey = ex+y (no parens, add).

Before this lesson: Product of powers

Where it comes from

Nested powers like (e2x)³ show up constantly — and students fresh off the product-of-powers law do the natural thing and add:

(ex)y = ex+y  ??the tempting — and wrong — guess

Kill it with numbers. Take x = 2, y = 3:

(e²)³
=
e² · e² · e² = e2+2+2 = e⁶
Cubing means three copies multiplied: e²·e²·e². The product-of-powers law adds: 2+2+2 = 6. Value ≈ 403.4.
e2+3 = e⁵
≈
148.4
The naive add-guess gives 148.4 — less than half the true value. Dead on arrival.

Here is the intuition that makes the real law obvious. (ex)y is y copies of ex multiplied together. We already know what to do with a product of same-base powers — the previous law adds the exponents. Adding x to itself y times is multiplication:

(ex)y
=
ex · ex ·…· ex   (y copies)
That is what raising to the y-th power means.
=
ex+x+…+x = exy
Product-of-powers adds the exponent y times: x + … + x = xy. The new law is the old law, applied repeatedly.

So the two laws are not rivals — this one contains the previous one. The parentheses are the entire difference: no outer parens, add; outer parens, multiply.

Before reading on: (e²)³ means e² · e² · e². What does the product-of-powers law turn that into — and what’s the general pattern?

Derivation

For a positive integer n, (ex)n is n copies multiplied — then the product-of-powers law does the rest. Real exponents need one definition first: for a > 0, ay := ey·ln a.

(ex)n
=
ex · ex ·…· ex   (n copies)
Step 1 — what ( )n means. An integer exponent is repeated multiplication. This step uses the definition of ^n, not any law.
=
ex+x+…+x = enx
Step 2 — the product-of-powers law. n copies of ex multiplied: add the exponent n times. Integer case proved.
(ex)y
=
ey·ln (ex) = ey·x = exy
Step 3 — key step: real y. Apply the definition ay := ey·ln a with a = ex, then collapse ln (ex) = x — the inverse pair. That one cancellation is the whole extension. ∎

The tower trap. (ex)y is not e(xy). Compare: (e²)³ = e⁶ ≈ 403.4, but e(2³) = e⁸ ≈ 2981. Exponent towers evaluate top-down; parentheses change the meaning entirely. If you see a stacked exponent with no parens, it is a tower, not this law.

Before reading on: which is bigger: (e³)² or e³ · e²? Compute it both ways.

How to use it

The procedure, every time:

  1. Spot the shape: a power raised to a power — parens with an exponent outside: (e2x)³. No outer parens? Then it is the product-of-powers law (add), not this one.
  2. Multiply the exponents, keep the base. (e2x)³ = e6x. Multiply everything upstairs: 2x · 3 = 6x.
  3. Simplify before calculus. d/dx [(e3x)²] becomes d/dx [e6x] = 6e6x — one line instead of a nested chain rule.

The paren test

ex · ey = ex+y   vs   (ex)y = exyno parens → add  ·  parens → multiplySay it: no parens means add the exponents; parens around the power means multiply them

Tricky cases

Fractional exponents: (e2x)1/2 = ex. No ± ambiguity — e2x is always positive, so the principal root is the only root. Negative exponents: (ex)−1 = e−x = 1/ex. Nested: ((ex)²)³ = e6x — work inside-out, or just multiply all three: x·2·3. Half-powers in reverse: ex/2 = (ex)1/2 = √(ex).

Common mistake: writing (e2x)³ = e2x³ — stacking the exponents into a tower instead of multiplying. e2x³ means e raised to 2x³, a completely different (and much bigger) function. Parens mean multiply: 2x·3 = 6x.

Worked examples

Four problems, easiest first. In each one, read every step — the why of each move is the lesson.

Example 1 — the basic move: (e³)²

  1. Spot the shape. Parens with an exponent outside — power of a power. ✓
  2. Multiply: 3 · 2 = 6, so = e⁶.
  3. Check numerically. e³ ≈ 20.086; squared ≈ 403.43; e⁶ ≈ 403.43. ✓
Common mistake: e3+2 = e⁵ ≈ 148.4 — adding, the product-of-powers reflex. The parens are the signal: multiply.
Your turn: (e4)³.

Answer: e12.

Multiply the exponents: 4 · 3 = 12. Check: e4 ≈ 54.6, cubed ≈ 162755 = e12 ✓.

Example 2 — with variables: (e2x)³

  1. Shape: power raised to a power. ✓
  2. Multiply everything upstairs: (2x)·3 = 6x. So = e6x.
  3. Check at x = 1. (e²)³ = e⁶ from Example 1; formula gives e6. ✓
Common mistake: e2x³ — multiplying only the 3 into the exponent's coefficient position wrong, i.e. stacking. Multiply the whole exponent: (2x)·3, not 2·(x³) and not 2x³.
Your turn: (e3x)².

Answer: e6x.

Parens with an exponent outside: multiply everything upstairs, (3x)·2 = 6x ✓.

Example 3 — simplify before differentiating: d/dx [(ex)²]

Path A — simplify first (one line).

  1. (ex)² = e2x.
  2. d/dx [e2x] = 2e2x.

Path B — chain rule directly (no simplifying).

  1. d/dx [(ex)²] = 2(ex)·ex = 2e2x. Same answer ✓ — but the unsimplified form is where students drop the inner ex.

The lesson: simplifying first turns a two-layer chain rule into a one-layer one. Fewer layers, fewer dropped factors.

Common mistake: writing d/dx [(ex)²] = 2ex — differentiating the outside and forgetting the inside's derivative (another ex). Path A makes this error impossible.
Your turn: Differentiate d/dx [(ex)³] by simplifying first.

Answer: 3e3x.

(ex)³ = e3x, so the derivative is 3e3x — no chain-rule nesting to fumble.

Example 4 — solving: (e2x)³ = e12

  1. Collapse the left side. (e2x)³ = e6x.
  2. Equate exponents. e6x = e12 ⇒ 6x = 12 (ex is one-to-one).
  3. Solve. x = 2.
  4. Check. (e⁴)³ = e12. ✓
Common mistake: “distributing” the cube as (e2x)³ = e2x·e2x·e2x and then stopping — that is correct but unfinished; the product-of-powers law finishes it to e6x. Don't stop halfway.
Your turn: Solve (e3x)² = e18.

Answer: x = 3.

Left side collapses to e6x = e18; ex is one-to-one, so 6x = 18 and x = 3 ✓.

Memorization tips

  • Say the pair aloud: “product of powers adds; power of a power multiplies.” The parens tell you which.
  • Three copies: (e²)³ is three copies of e², each bringing its 2 along: 2+2+2 = 6 = 2·3. Repeated addition is multiplication.
  • The tower guard: (e²)³ = e⁶ but e(2³) = e⁸. Stacked exponents without parens evaluate top-down — a different beast.
  • Self-check: (e¹)² = e² is obvious and anchors multiply. If your rule gives e³ here, it's the wrong rule.
  • Read it backwards: exy → (ex)y. Splitting a product-exponent is how half-powers appear: ex/2 = √(ex).
  • Numeric anchor: (e²)³ ≈ 403.4. Adding gives 148.4 (too small), tower gives 2981 (too big) — 403.4 sits between, exactly where e⁶ lives.

Final challenge

Five mixed questions — basics, applications, and the traps, all in one. Score 5/5 and the power of a power is yours.

← Back to the Calculus I formula sheet

How to learn a formula here

  1. Read each section in order — every section ends with a short quiz. Take it before moving on; the questions test exactly what you just read.
  2. Work the examples with the answers covered, then uncover one step at a time and compare.
  3. Finish with the final challenge — five mixed questions including the classic traps.
  4. Retake what you miss — every quiz reshuffles each attempt, and every answer explains itself.

Frequently asked questions

What is the power-of-a-power law?

When a power is raised to another power, keep the base and multiply the exponents: (ex)y = exy. For example, (e²)³ = e⁶.

How is (ex)y different from ex·ey?

The parentheses are the entire difference. ex·ey has no outer exponent, so the exponents add (ex+y). (ex)y raises the whole power again, so the exponents multiply (exy).

Why do the exponents multiply?

(ex)y is y copies of ex multiplied together. The product-of-powers law adds the exponent y times: x + x + … + x = xy.

Is (ex)y the same as e(xy)?

No — this is the tower trap. (e²)³ = e⁶, but e(2³) = e⁸. Exponent towers evaluate top-down, and the parentheses change the meaning entirely.

What is (e2x)1/2?

ex. Multiply: 2x·(1/2) = x. There is no ± ambiguity because e2x is always positive.

More from the codex