Calculus I › Limits › full formula sheet

limx→∞ f(x) = L  ⇒  horizontal asymptote y = L

Limits at infinity

Where the graph settles as x runs away — and how to read it off in seconds.

On this page x → ∞ (and x → −∞) replaces x → a. The limit laws still apply — but “infinity” is a direction, never a number you can do arithmetic with.

Notation in this lesson

limx→∞
x grows without bound
y = L
horizontal asymptote — the line the graph settles toward
1/xn → 0
the terms that die as x → ∞

Where it comes from

The problem: end behavior — where does the graph go as x gets huge? For rational functions this decides horizontal asymptotes, and the naive move is catastrophic:

lim(x→∞) x²/x
=
infinity
Grows like x. Not 1.
lim(x→∞) x/x²
=
0
Shrinks like 1/x. Not 1.
lim(x→∞) 2x/x
=
2
Constant 2. Not 1 either.

Three “infinity over infinity” limits, three different answers. ∞/∞ is indeterminate — the ratio of growth rates decides, never a fixed rule. The technique that resolves all three at once: divide by the highest power, turning every term into something that → 0 except the dominant balance.

Before reading on: in (3x²+1)/(x²−5), which terms stop mattering as x → ∞ — and what survives?
lim(x→∞) (3x²+1)/(x²−5) = lim(x→∞) (3 + 1/x²)/(1 − 5/x²) = 3/1 = 3divide top and bottom by x²; every 1/x² term diesSay it: the limit as x approaches infinity of three x squared plus one over x squared minus five equals three

Derivation

The definition swaps δ for N (“eventually”), then we prove lim(x→∞) 1/x = 0 — the engine inside every divide-by-highest-power computation.

lim(x→∞) f = L
⇔
∀ε > 0, ∃N: x > N ⇒ |f(x) − L| < ε
Step 1 — the epsilon-N definition. “Eventually (past some N), f stays within epsilon of L.” N plays δ’s role, but on the x-axis at infinity instead of near a point.
ε > 0 given
⇒
take N = 1/ε
Step 2 — choose N from ε. For 1/x: we need 1/x < ε, i.e. x > 1/ε. So this N works.
x > N
⇒
|1/x − 0| = 1/x < ε
Step 3 — verify. x > 1/ε ⇒ 1/x < ε. Since ε was arbitrary, 1/x → 0. ∎

Key steps shown; the argument above is complete. For x → −infinity the definition reads x < N (N very negative) ⇒ |f−L| < ε. And 1/xn → 0 for every n > 0 by the same argument — which is why dividing by the highest power kills every non-dominant term.

How to use it

The procedure for rational functions, every time:

  1. Divide every term by the highest power of x in the denominator.
  2. Let x → ∞: every 1/xn term → 0. Only the dominant balance survives.
  3. Read the degree shortcut: deg(top) < deg(bottom) → 0 · deg(top) = deg(bottom) → ratio of leading coefficients · deg(top) > deg(bottom) → ±infinity (no horizontal asymptote).
  4. Check x → −infinity separately when degrees differ — the sign can flip.

Horizontal asymptotes

lim(x→∞) f(x) = L means the line y = L is a horizontal asymptote — the graph settles toward it. The two ends can have different asymptotes (arctan x → π/2 at +infinity, −π/2 at −infinity), and a graph may cross its horizontal asymptote — even infinitely often, like (sin x)/x. The asymptote describes the tail, not a barrier.

Common mistake: “infinity/infinity = 1”. The trio at the top of this page — infinity, 0, 2 — kills it. Always divide by the highest power (or compare degrees) instead.

Worked examples

Four problems, easiest first. In each one, read every step — the why of each move is the lesson.

Example 1 — equal degrees: lim(x→∞) (3x²+1)/(x²−5)

  1. Divide by x² (highest denominator power): (3 + 1/x²)/(1 − 5/x²).
  2. Let x → infinity: 1/x² → 0 and 5/x² → 0.
  3. Survivors: 3/1 = 3. Horizontal asymptote y = 3.
  4. Degree shortcut check: equal degrees → ratio of leading coefficients: 3/1 = 3. Matches ✓
Common mistake: dividing by x instead of x² — then 1/x terms survive unevenly and the algebra lies. Always the highest denominator power.
Your turn: limx→∞ (5x²−2)/(2x²+7) = ?

Answer: 5/2.

Divide by x²: (5 − 2/x²)/(2 + 7/x²) → 5/2. Horizontal asymptote y = 5/2.

Example 2 — denominator wins: lim(x→∞) (x+1)/(x²+3)

  1. Divide by x²: (1/x + 1/x²)/(1 + 3/x²).
  2. Let x → infinity: everything up top → 0; bottom → 1.
  3. Result: 0/1 = 0. Horizontal asymptote y = 0 (the x-axis).
Common mistake: “infinity/infinity, so use L’Hôpital.” Unnecessary machinery — degree comparison gives 0 instantly (and L’Hôpital needs differentiability hypotheses you’d have to check).
Your turn: limx→∞ (4x−1)/(x³+2) = ?

Answer: 0.

Divide by x³: (4/x² − 1/x³)/(1 + 2/x³) → 0/1 = 0.

Example 3 — at minus infinity: lim(x→−∞) (2x³)/(x³−1)

  1. Divide by x³: 2/(1 − 1/x³).
  2. Let x → −infinity: 1/x³ → 0 (sign doesn’t matter for something → 0).
  3. Result: 2/1 = 2.
Common mistake: assuming −infinity flips the answer for equal degrees. It doesn’t — the ratio of leading coefficients rules both ends. (Unequal degrees are where signs bite.)
Your turn: limx→−∞ (3x³+1)/(x³−5) = ?

Answer: 3.

Divide by x³: (3 + 1/x³)/(1 − 5/x³) → 3/1 = 3.

Before reading on: the top degree beats the bottom degree here. Horizontal asymptote — or does something else happen?

Example 4 — the trap: lim(x→∞) (x²+1)/x

  1. Degree check: top degree 2 > bottom degree 1 → unbounded, no horizontal asymptote.
  2. Simplify to see how: (x²+1)/x = x + 1/x → +infinity (grows like x).
Common mistake: “infinity/infinity = 1” — the trio at the top of the page says otherwise. When the top wins, simplify and read the growth rate.
Your turn: limx→∞ (2x²+3)/x = ?

Answer: +∞.

Top degree wins — no horizontal asymptote. (2x²+3)/x = 2x + 3/x → +∞.

Memorization tips

  • Divide by the highest denominator power: the one technique. Everything else on this page is commentary on it.
  • The degree shortcut: top < bottom → 0; equal → ratio of leading coefficients; top > bottom → ±infinity. Three cases, five seconds.
  • ∞/∞ is indeterminate: the x²/x, x/x², 2x/x trio (infinity, 0, 2) is the counterexample to memorize.
  • N replaces delta: “eventually past N” is the at-infinity version of “within delta of a.” Same proof architecture.
  • Asymptotes can be crossed: y = L describes the tail, not a wall. (sin x)/x crosses y = 0 infinitely often on its way there.
  • Check −infinity separately when degrees differ — that’s where sign flips hide. Equal degrees: the ratio rules both ends.

Final challenge

Five mixed questions — basics, applications, and the traps, all in one. Score 5/5 and this law is yours.

← Back to the Calculus I formula sheet

How to learn a formula here

  1. Read each section in order — every section ends with a short quiz. Take it before moving on; the questions test exactly what you just read.
  2. Work the examples with the answers covered, then uncover one step at a time and compare.
  3. Finish with the final challenge — five mixed questions including the classic traps.
  4. Retake what you miss — every quiz reshuffles each attempt, and every answer explains itself.

Frequently asked questions

How do I compute a limit at infinity for a rational function?

Divide every term by the highest power of x in the denominator, then let x → ∞: all 1/xⁿ terms → 0, leaving the dominant balance. Shortcut: lower top degree → 0; equal degrees → ratio of leading coefficients; higher top degree → ±∞.

Why isn't ∞/∞ = 1?

It's indeterminate: lim(x→∞) x²/x = ∞, lim x/x² = 0, and lim 2x/x = 2. The ratio of growth rates decides — never a fixed rule.

What is a horizontal asymptote?

The line y = L where lim(x→∞) f(x) = L (or x → −∞). The graph settles toward it. The two ends may have different asymptotes, and the graph may cross it — it describes the tail, not a barrier.

What is the ε-N definition?

lim(x→∞) f(x) = L means: for every ε > 0 there is an N such that x > N implies |f(x) − L| < ε. 'Eventually, f stays within ε of L.' N plays δ's role at infinity.

Does x → −∞ ever give a different answer?

For equal degrees, no — the ratio of leading coefficients rules both ends. When the top degree is higher, signs can flip, so check −∞ separately.

More from the codex