Calculus I › Limits › full formula sheet

limx→a c·f(x) = c·L

The constant multiple law

Constants pull straight out of limits — but only genuine constants.

On this page c is a genuine constant (no x inside) and L = limx→a f(x) exists (finite). The most abused law in the chapter is abused exactly here.

Notation in this lesson

c
a genuine constant — no x inside
L
limx→a f(x), assumed to exist and be finite
limx→a
the limit as x approaches a

Where it comes from

The simplest limit law — and the most abused. Scaling a graph vertically by c scales every limit by c: if f(x) hugs L, then 5·f(x) hugs 5L. One line, enormous leverage: it is what lets you pull coefficients out before thinking.

Before reading on: is x² a “constant” you can pull out of limx→0? What test decides whether a pull-out is legal?
lim(x→a) c·f(x) = c · lim(x→a) f(x)c constant (no x inside)Say it: the limit as x approaches a of c times f of x equals c times the limit as x approaches a of f of x

The abuse is “pulling out” something that isn’t constant:

lim(x→0) x·(1/x)
=
1
The honest answer. For x ≠ 0, x·(1/x) = 1 exactly, so the limit is 1.
“pull out 1/x”
=
(1/x) · lim(x→0) x = (1/x)·0
Illegal twice over. 1/x is not constant, so the law doesn’t apply — and “(1/x)·0” isn’t even a number. The pull-out move silently assumed what it needed to prove.

The intuition is scaling: multiplying every function value by c multiplies every error by |c|, so an error budget of epsilon for f becomes |c|·epsilon for c·f — still arbitrarily small. The derivation is two lines.

Derivation

Two routes — the one-line route and the epsilon-delta route. Both are worth seeing.

lim c·f
=
lim c · lim f = c·L
Route A — one line via the product law. The constant function g(x) = c has limit c. Feed g and f into the product law: done. This is why the limit laws are a family, not a list.
|cf − cL|
=
|c| · |f − L|
Route B, step 1 — factor the constant out of the error. The error in c·f is just |c| times the error in f.
ε → ε/|c|
⇒
|cf − cL| < ε
Route B, step 2 — rescale the budget. Given ε > 0 (and c ≠ 0; c = 0 is trivial), demand |f − L| < ε/|c| from lim f = L. Multiplying back by |c| lands exactly on ε. ∎

Key steps shown; both arguments are complete. Route A shows the law is redundant given the product law — it survives as a separate law purely because you use it a hundred times a day. The difference law’s proof (f − g = f + (−g)) leans on this law for the −1.

How to use it

The procedure, every time:

  1. Confirm c is genuinely constant. No x inside — not x², not sin x, not 1/x. Parameters (k, π, a) that don’t depend on x are fine.
  2. Pull it out, evaluate lim f, then multiply back.
  3. Combine freely with sum/product/quotient laws — pulling constants out first usually simplifies everything downstream.

Constants vs parameters vs variables

In lim(x→a) k·x², k pulls out whether k is a number (5), a named constant (π), or a parameter — what matters is that k doesn’t contain x. But c may depend on a (the point you’re approaching): in lim(x→a) a·x, the “a” is constant with respect to x, so it pulls out to give a².

Common mistake: pulling out a factor containing x, especially 1/x or sin(1/x). If it wiggles or blows up as x varies, it stays inside.

Worked examples

Four problems, easiest first. In each one, read every step — the why of each move is the lesson.

Example 1 — the basic move: lim(x→3) 5x²

  1. Confirm: 5 is constant. Pull it out: 5 · lim(x→3) x².
  2. Evaluate: lim x² = 9 (power law).
  3. Multiply back: 5 · 9 = 45.
Common mistake: “distributing” the limit as lim 5 · lim x · lim x. Legal via the product law, but why do three splits when one pull-out does it?
Your turn: limx→4 3x² = ?

Answer: 48.

Pull out the 3: 3·limx→4 x². Then lim x² = 16, so 3·16 = 48.

Example 2 — negative constant: lim(x→0) −2 sin x

  1. Pull out −2: −2 · lim(x→0) sin x.
  2. Evaluate: sin is continuous, sin 0 = 0.
  3. Multiply back: −2 · 0 = 0.
Common mistake: dropping the minus when pulling out. Carry the sign with the constant: it’s (−2), not 2.
Your turn: limx→0 4 cos x = ?

Answer: 4.

Pull out the 4: 4·limx→0 cos x. Cosine is continuous and cos 0 = 1, so 4·1 = 4.

Example 3 — combined with the sum law: lim(x→1) (7x³ − 2x)

  1. Split first (sum law): lim 7x³ − lim 2x.
  2. Pull out each constant: 7 · lim x³ − 2 · lim x = 7·1 − 2·1.
  3. Combine: 7 − 2 = 5.
Common mistake: pulling out the x’s instead of the numbers. Constants pull out; variables stay in.
Your turn: limx→2 (3x² + 5x) = ?

Answer: 22.

Split (sum law), then pull each constant: 3·lim x² + 5·lim x = 3·4 + 5·2 = 12 + 10 = 22.

Before reading on: in limx→0 x·(1/x), which factor looks pull-out-able — and what goes wrong if you pull it?

Example 4 — the trap: lim(x→0) x·(1/x)

  1. Can we pull out 1/x? No — it contains x (and its limit DNE). The law is off.
  2. Can we pull out x? Also no — x is the variable.
  3. Simplify instead: x·(1/x) = 1 for x ≠ 0, so the limit is 1.
Common mistake: “(1/x) · lim(x→0) x = (1/x) · 0 = 0”. Two errors: illegal pull-out, then treating (1/x)·0 as 0 instead of meaningless.
Your turn: limx→0 x²·(1/x) = ?

Answer: 0.

Neither factor is constant (both contain x), so the law is off. Simplify first: x²·(1/x) = x for x ≠ 0, so the limit is 0.

Memorization tips

  • The x-ray test: cover the factor — if you can still see an x, it doesn’t pull out. 5, π, k, −2 pull out; x, 1/x, sin x stay in.
  • Pull out early: constants pulled out before splitting usually make every downstream step simpler. It’s the cheapest simplification in the chapter.
  • Signs travel with the constant: pull out (−2), not 2-with-a-minus-to-remember-later.
  • One-line proof as memory hook: constant function g(x) = c has limit c; product law does the rest. If you forget the law, rebuild it in five seconds.
  • c may depend on a: in lim(x→a), anything without x is constant — even the letter a itself.
  • The law that powers the difference law: f − g = f + (−1)·g. The −1 pulls out by exactly this law.

Final challenge

Five mixed questions — basics, applications, and the traps, all in one. Score 5/5 and this law is yours.

← Back to the Calculus I formula sheet

How to learn a formula here

  1. Read each section in order — every section ends with a short quiz. Take it before moving on; the questions test exactly what you just read.
  2. Work the examples with the answers covered, then uncover one step at a time and compare.
  3. Finish with the final challenge — five mixed questions including the classic traps.
  4. Retake what you miss — every quiz reshuffles each attempt, and every answer explains itself.

Frequently asked questions

What is the constant multiple law for limits?

If lim(x→a) f(x) = L exists and c is constant, then lim(x→a) c·f(x) = c·L: genuine constants pull straight out of limits.

Can I pull out 1/x or sin x?

No — the law only applies to genuine constants (no x inside). Pulling out 1/x from lim(x→0) x·(1/x) is illegal; simplifying first gives the correct answer, 1.

Why does the proof work?

Two views: (A) the constant function g(x) = c has limit c, so the product law gives c·L in one line; (B) |cf−cL| = |c|·|f−L|, so rescaling the error budget by |c| lands exactly on ε.

Can the constant depend on a, the point I'm approaching?

Yes — 'constant' means constant with respect to x. In lim(x→a) a·x, the a pulls out (giving a²) because a doesn't vary with x.

How does this law relate to the difference law?

The difference law is proved by writing f−g = f+(−1)·g: the −1 pulls out by the constant multiple law, and the sum law finishes.

More from the codex