Calculus I › Limits › full formula sheet

limx→a [f(x)]n = Ln

The power law for limits

Evaluate the inside, then raise to the power — for positive integer exponents.

On this page n is a positive integer (1, 2, 3, …) and L = limx→a f(x) exists (finite). Fractional or negative exponents play by stricter rules — see below.

Before this lesson: The product law

Notation in this lesson

[f(x)]n
the nth power of f
Ln
the limit raised to the n
n
a positive integer here

Where it comes from

The problem: limits like lim(x→2) (x²+1)³ come up constantly — a whole expression raised to a power. Multiplying it out as (x²+1)(x²+1)(x²+1) and splitting three ways works, but the power law packages that tedium into one move: evaluate the inside (5), then cube it (125).

Before reading on: if limx→a f = 5, what should limx→a f³ be — and which law justifies moving the power outside the limit?
lim(x→a) [f(x)]n = [lim(x→a) f(x)]nn a positive integerSay it: the limit as x approaches a of f of x to the n equals the limit as x approaches a of f of x, all raised to the n

The naive overreach is assuming this works for any exponent. It does not:

lim(x→−1) x1/2
=
“√(−1)”
Broken. √x isn’t even defined for real x near −1, so there is no (two-sided real) limit to take. The power law’s integer-n hypothesis exists precisely to dodge this.
lim(x→a) [f(x)]−n
=
1 / [f(x)]n territory
Different law. Negative exponents are reciprocals — that is the quotient law’s job (and it needs L ≠ 0).

The intuition is pure product law: [f(x)]n is f(x) multiplied by itself n times, so its limit is L multiplied by itself n times. The derivation is that sentence, formalized as induction.

Derivation

We prove: if lim(x→a) f(x) = L, then lim(x→a) [f(x)]n = Ln for every positive integer n — by induction on n.

n = 1
⇒
lim f(x) = L = L¹
Step 1 — base case. Nothing to prove: the claim for n = 1 is the hypothesis.
[f]k+1
=
[f]k · f
Step 2 — split off one factor. A power is a product: peel one f off the (k+1)-fold product, leaving a k-fold product times f.
lim [f]k+1
=
lim [f]k · lim f = Lk · L = Lk+1
Step 3 — product law + induction hypothesis. The induction hypothesis says lim[f]k = Lk; the product law (both pieces converge) multiplies by lim f = L. ∎

Key steps shown; the induction is complete. Why does induction guarantee every intermediate limit exists? Because each step’s hypotheses are exactly the previous step’s conclusion — the product law is never invoked on a divergent piece. For n = 0 the formula would give [f]0 = 1 (where defined), consistent but usually stated for n ≥ 1.

How to use it

The procedure, every time:

  1. Confirm the exponent is a positive integer. Fractional exponents → root law with domain checks; negative integer exponents → quotient law (needs L ≠ 0).
  2. Evaluate the inner limit L = lim(x→a) f(x), using whatever tools fit.
  3. Raise: the answer is Ln.
  4. Nested with other laws? Work inside-out: innermost limit first, then apply the power, then whatever is outside.

Power law vs expanding

For lim(x→2) (x+1)² you could expand to x² + 2x + 1 and split three ways — or evaluate the inside (3) and square (9). Same answer; the power law skips the algebra. Reach for it whenever the inside is simpler than the expansion.

Common mistake: applying the power law to fractional powers of negative bases, e.g. “lim(x→−4) √x = √(−4)”. Check the domain before you raise.

Worked examples

Four problems, easiest first. In each one, read every step — the why of each move is the lesson.

Example 1 — the basic move: lim(x→2) (x²+1)³

  1. Inner limit first. lim(x→2) (x²+1) = 4 + 1 = 5 (sum + power laws).
  2. Raise. 5³ = 125.
Common mistake: cubing before evaluating — (x²+1)³ expands to a degree-6 mess. Inside first, power last.
Your turn: limx→1 (x²+3)² = ?

Answer: 16.

Inner limit first: 1 + 3 = 4. Raise: 4² = 16.

Example 2 — linear inside: lim(x→3) (2x−1)²

  1. Inner limit: 2·3 − 1 = 5.
  2. Raise: 5² = 25.
Common mistake: writing (2x−1)² = 4x² − 1 (dropping the cross term). The power law dodges expansion risk entirely.
Your turn: limx→4 (2x−3)³ = ?

Answer: 125.

Inner: 8 − 3 = 5. Raise: 5³ = 125.

Example 3 — combined with the quotient law: lim(x→1) [(x²+3)/(2x)]²

  1. Inner limit first (quotient law; denominator → 2 ≠ 0): (1+3)/(2·1) = 4/2 = 2.
  2. Raise: 2² = 4.
  3. Why this order: the power law applies to the whole fraction — evaluate the fraction’s limit, then square.
Common mistake: squaring top and bottom separately and re-splitting. Legal but twice the work — and twice the sign-error surface.
Your turn: limx→2 [(x²+1)/(3x)]² = ?

Answer: 25/36.

Inner limit (quotient law; denominator → 6 ≠ 0): (4+1)/6 = 5/6. Square: 25/36.

Before reading on: the inside tends to −10 and the power is even. Predict the sign of the answer before computing.

Example 4 — negative inside, even power: lim(x→−2) (x³+x)²

  1. Inner limit: (−2)³ + (−2) = −8 − 2 = −10.
  2. Raise: (−10)² = 100.
Common mistake: “the inside is negative, so something is wrong.” Nothing is wrong — integer powers handle negative bases fine. The danger is only fractional powers of negatives.
Your turn: limx→−3 (x²−x)² = ?

Answer: 144.

Inner: 9 − (−3) = 12. Raise: 12² = 144.

Memorization tips

  • Inside first, power last: the four-word procedure. Say it while you work.
  • The power law is the product law on autopilot: [f]n is f multiplied by itself n times — induction just writes that down formally.
  • Integer n only: fractional exponents are the root law’s territory (domain checks required); negative exponents are the quotient law’s (needs L ≠ 0).
  • It beats expanding: (2x−1)² → 25 via inside-first vs a FOIL expansion. Fewer steps, fewer sign errors.
  • Watch the parity: even powers erase signs — (−10)² = 100. If your answer’s sign surprises you, check whether the exponent is even.
  • Nesting order: with combined laws, always work inside-out: innermost limit, then the power, then the outer operation.

Final challenge

Five mixed questions — basics, applications, and the traps, all in one. Score 5/5 and this law is yours.

← Back to the Calculus I formula sheet

How to learn a formula here

  1. Read each section in order — every section ends with a short quiz. Take it before moving on; the questions test exactly what you just read.
  2. Work the examples with the answers covered, then uncover one step at a time and compare.
  3. Finish with the final challenge — five mixed questions including the classic traps.
  4. Retake what you miss — every quiz reshuffles each attempt, and every answer explains itself.

Frequently asked questions

What is the power law for limits?

If lim(x→a) f(x) = L exists and n is a positive integer, then lim(x→a) [f(x)]ⁿ = Lⁿ: evaluate the inside limit, then raise to the power.

Why is n restricted to positive integers?

Fractional powers can break on negative bases (√(−1) isn't real), and negative exponents are reciprocals — the quotient law's job, needing L ≠ 0. The integer-n version is always safe.

How does the power law relate to the product law?

It's the product law applied n times: [f]ⁿ is f multiplied by itself n times, so induction plus the product law gives Lⁿ. The constant multiple and sum laws often evaluate the inside.

Should I expand (x+1)² before taking the limit?

No need — evaluate the inside (3 at x→2) and square to get 9. The power law skips the expansion and its sign-error risk.

Does the power law work if the inner limit is negative?

Yes for integer n: lim(x→−2)(x³+x)² = (−10)² = 100. Only fractional powers of negative bases are problematic.

More from the codex