Calculus I › Limits › full formula sheet

limx→∞ (1 + 1/x)x = e ≈ 2.71828

The definition of e

The number that compound interest converges to — no matter how often you compound.

On this page e ≈ 2.71828… is defined as this limit (it is irrational, in fact transcendental). Equivalent forms: lim(n→∞)(1+1/n)n = e and lim(x→0)(1+x)1/x = e.

Before this lesson: Limits at infinity

Notation in this lesson

e
≈ 2.71828 — the base of natural growth
limn→∞
the limit as n grows without bound
(1+1/n)n
the compounding expression: more frequent compounding, smaller pieces

Where it comes from

Put $1 in a bank at 100% annual interest. Compounded yearly: (1+1)1 = $2. Compounded monthly: (1+1/12)12 ≈ $2.61. Compounded daily: (1+1/365)365 ≈ $2.71. Compounded every second — do you get rich?

Before reading on: 100% interest compounded infinitely often — guess: does the money explode to infinity, or settle near some number?
e = lim(n→∞) (1 + 1/n)n ≈ 2.71828…more compounding helps less and less — it converges, not explodesSay it: e equals the limit as n approaches infinity of one plus one over n, all raised to the n

The naive guesses:

“infinite compounding → infinite money”
→
wrong — it converges to e
Trap 1. Each extra compounding period adds less than the last. The sequence is increasing but bounded (below 3, as the proof shows) — so it settles at e ≈ 2.71828, not infinity.
“the limit is 2”
→
wrong — monthly already beats 2
Trap 2. (1+1/12)12 ≈ 2.613 > 2. The limit keeps growing past every finite compounding — it just grows to e, not past it.

The intuition: (1+1/n)n balances two forces — the base (1+1/n) shrinking toward 1, the exponent n growing toward infinity. It’s a 1∞ indeterminate form, and the balance point is e. The derivation proves the balance point exists; the digits come from computing.

Derivation

We prove the limit exists (then we may name it e) via the binomial theorem + the Monotone Convergence Theorem: increasing and bounded above ⇒ convergent.

(1+1/n)n
=
Σ (1/k!) · [(1)(1−1/n)…(1−(k−1)/n)]
Step 1 — binomial expansion. (1+1/n)n = Σk=0n C(n,k)/nk. Each term is (1/k!) times a product of k factors, each of the form (1 − j/n) < 1.
n grows
⇒
every term grows
Step 2 — increasing. As n grows, each factor (1 − j/n) increases toward 1, and a new positive term appears. So every term grows and terms are added: the sequence is increasing.
term ≤ 1/k!
⇒
Σ 1/k! < 3
Step 3 — bounded above. Each bracketed product is < 1, so term k ≤ 1/k!. And 1 + 1 + 1/2 + 1/6 + 1/24 + … < 1 + 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + … = 3. So the sequence stays below 3.
increasing + bounded
⇒
converges — call it e
Step 4 — monotone convergence. An increasing sequence bounded above must converge (it can’t oscillate, and it can’t escape). We define e to be this limit: e ≈ 2.71828…. ∎

Key steps shown; the existence argument is complete. Note what this proves: existence, not digits — the 2.71828… comes from computing partial sums (or (1+1/1000)1000 ≈ 2.717). Analysis guarantees the limit is there; arithmetic tells you its address. (e is irrational — in fact transcendental — but that’s another page.)

How to use it

The procedure, every time:

  1. Spot the shape: (1 + □)1/□ with □ → 0, or (1+1/□)□ with □ → infinity — a 1∞ form.
  2. Rewrite to match exactly: the fraction’s denominator and the exponent must be the same □. (1+2/x)x = [(1+2/x)x/2]² → e².
  3. Apply: the matched core → e; outer powers/constants follow by the power law.
  4. Variants: lim(n→∞)(1+1/n)n, lim(x→∞)(1+1/x)x, lim(x→0)(1+x)1/x are all e (substitute n = 1/x for the last).

The exponent must match

(1+1/n)n² = [(1+1/n)n]n ≈ en → infinity — the exponent outruns the base. (1+1/n²)n → 1 — the base approaches 1 too fast (n·ln(1+1/n²) ≈ 1/n → 0). Only the matched form gives e. Mismatches are a favorite exam trap.

Common mistake: “(1+1/n)n² → e”. The definition needs the exponent to equal the denominator’s n — n² breaks the balance and the limit explodes to infinity.

Worked examples

Four problems, easiest first. In each one, read every step — the why of each move is the lesson.

Example 1 — the definition: lim(n→∞) (1+1/n)n

  1. Recognize the shape: exactly (1+1/□)□ with □ = n → infinity.
  2. Apply: this is e, by definition. Answer: e.
Common mistake: “1∞ = 1”. Indeterminate forms don’t work that way — this one equals e ≈ 2.718, not 1.
Your turn: limn→∞ (1+1/n)2n = ?

Answer: e².

Write it as [(1+1/n)n]². The inside → e, so the square → e² by the power law.

Before reading on: (1+2/x)x — the fraction says 2/x but the exponent says x. Is the answer e, e², or neither? What has to match?

Example 2 — scaled: lim(x→∞) (1+2/x)x

  1. Match the form: the fraction says 2/x but the exponent says x. Rewrite: (1+2/x)x = [(1+2/x)x/2]².
  2. Inner limit: as x → infinity, x/2 → infinity, so (1+2/x)x/2 → e (with □ = x/2).
  3. Outer power: e² by the power law. Answer: e².
Common mistake: answering e — forgetting the ×2 inside changes the balance. General rule: lim(x→∞)(1+k/x)x = ek.
Your turn: limx→∞ (1+3/x)x = ?

Answer: e³.

Rewrite as [(1+3/x)x/3]³: the inside → e (with □ = x/3 → ∞), then cube → e³.

Example 3 — fractional power: lim(x→∞) (1+1/(2x))x

  1. Match: (1+1/(2x))x = [(1+1/(2x))2x]1/2.
  2. Inner: (1+1/(2x))2x → e (with □ = 2x).
  3. Outer: e1/2 = √e.
Common mistake: “the 2x vs x mismatch means it’s not e” — then giving up. The mismatch just contributes an outer power; rewrite and proceed.
Your turn: limx→∞ (1+1/(3x))x = ?

Answer: ∛e = e1/3.

Write as [(1+1/(3x))3x]1/3 → e1/3.

Example 4 — the x → 0 variant: lim(x→0) (1+x)1/x

  1. Substitute n = 1/x: as x → 0, n → ±infinity, and (1+x)1/x = (1+1/n)n.
  2. Apply: → e (both one-sided n-limits give e).
Common mistake: treating x → 0 as a different theorem. It’s the same limit wearing a substitution — n = 1/x translates between the forms.
Your turn: limx→0 (1+2x)1/x = ?

Answer: e².

Rewrite as [(1+2x)1/(2x)]² → e².

Memorization tips

  • The compound-interest story: (1+1/n)n is $1 at 100% compounded n times. n = 12 gives 2.61, n = 365 gives 2.71, n → infinity gives e. The story is the definition.
  • The exponent must match the denominator: (1+1/□)□ → e. Mismatches explode (² → infinity) or collapse (→ 1).
  • Generalize: lim(x→∞)(1+k/x)x = ek. The k just rides along into the exponent.
  • 1∞ is indeterminate: never “equals 1”. This page’s e, the mismatches’ infinity and 1 — three answers from one shape.
  • Existence vs digits: the binomial/monotone proof shows the limit exists; computing (1+1/1000)1000 ≈ 2.717 gives the digits.
  • Why e matters: it’s the unique base with d/dx[ex] = ex — the fixed point of differentiation. This limit is where that base comes from.

Final challenge

Five mixed questions — basics, applications, and the traps, all in one. Score 5/5 and this law is yours.

← Back to the Calculus I formula sheet

How to learn a formula here

  1. Read each section in order — every section ends with a short quiz. Take it before moving on; the questions test exactly what you just read.
  2. Work the examples with the answers covered, then uncover one step at a time and compare.
  3. Finish with the final challenge — five mixed questions including the classic traps.
  4. Retake what you miss — every quiz reshuffles each attempt, and every answer explains itself.

Frequently asked questions

What is the definition of e?

e = lim(n→∞)(1+1/n)ⁿ ≈ 2.71828… — the number compound interest converges to. Equivalent forms: lim(x→∞)(1+1/x)ˣ = e and lim(x→0)(1+x)^{1/x} = e.

Why doesn't infinite compounding give infinite money?

Each extra compounding period adds less than the last: the sequence (1+1/n)ⁿ is increasing but bounded above by 3, so it converges to e ≈ 2.71828 instead of exploding.

How do you prove the limit exists?

Binomial expansion shows every term grows with n (increasing sequence) and each term ≤ 1/k!, with Σ1/k! < 3 (bounded above). Increasing + bounded ⇒ convergent, by the Monotone Convergence Theorem.

What is lim(x→∞)(1+2/x)ˣ?

e². Rewrite as [(1+2/x)^{x/2}]²: the inner matched form → e, and the outer square gives e². In general, lim(1+k/x)ˣ = eᵏ.

What goes wrong with (1+1/n)^{n²}?

The exponent must match the denominator. (1+1/n)^{n²} = [(1+1/n)ⁿ]ⁿ ≈ eⁿ → ∞ — the exponent outruns the base. Only the matched form gives e.

More from the codex